Mossad Agent? Nice & Munich Photographer Richard Gutjahr Had To Have Prior Knowledge?

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Video: The Gutjahr’s Exposed and Running Scared

Mossad false-flag terrorist Gutjahr “accidentally deleted” his Munich photos


This Jewish Telegraph Agency story needs to be read to be believed.

By Kevin BarrettVeterans Today Editor (click the embedded video above to watch us discuss this story on False Flag Weekly News with special guest host Jeremy Rothe-Kushel – click HERE for links to all the stories)

Sometimes it isn’t the crime that gets you, it’s the cover-up.

One of the clumsiest cover-ups in history may take down the Israeli Mossad Department of False Flag Operations, along with its idiot operative, two-time-loser Richard Gutjahr.

Gutjahr, as I revealed last week, was pre-positioned on the scene of  the recent terror attacks in Nice, France and Munich, Germany. A professional photographer, married to high-level Israeli neocon operator Einat Wilf, Gutjahr is apparently tasked with filming the beginnings of false flag terror attacks and broadcasting them to the world.

Gutjahr, as I revealed last week, was pre-positioned on the scene of  the recent terror attacks in Nice, France and Munich, Germany. A professional photographer, married to high-level Israeli neocon operator Einat Wilf, Gutjahr is apparently tasked with filming the beginnings of false flag terror attacks and broadcasting them to the world.

Less than one hour after I exposed Gutjahr’s presence at the scene of the Munich shopping mall attack, he removed photos of the shooting from his Twitter feed. The same photos simultaneously disappeared from a Russia Today article on the attack.

Now Gutjahr is claiming that he ACCIDENTALLY deleted those photos — which could be used as evidence against him in an “accessory to mass murder” trial.

Listen to me, Richard Gutjahr: How can you ACCIDENTALLY delete the same photos from your Twitter feed, your camera, AND Russia Today all at once?! Are you telling me this three-pronged ACCIDENT just happened to happen immediately after those photos had been exposed as evidence of your complicity in two separate acts of mass murder?! Do you really expect the jury to believe THAT?!!

Did you slip on a banana peel and accidentally bump the “delete” key on your camera as you fell to the ground? And then, as you picked yourself up and dusted yourself off, did you drop your smartphone in such a way that it bounced along the ground, coincidentally landing on the keys that took the photo down from your Twitter feed while also composing and sending an email to RT telling them to take it down as well?! WOW! Some “ACCIDENT”!

And do you expect the jury to believe that you JUST HAPPENED to be on that balcony in Nice filming that truck, for no particular reason, immediately before it began running amok?! And then JUST HAPPENED to be on the scene of the shopping mall attack in Munich a few days later?!!!!

If all this is coincidence, Richard Gutjahr, then you are the unluckiest human being that ever walked the earth…because you are going to prison for this (unless, of course, you manage to get to Israel before they arrest you). The odds of all these coincidences happening innocently are one in several trillion at best. That is far, far beyond the “reasonable doubt” standard. Any cop who doesn’t immediately arrest you needs to be arrested themselves.

The Gutjahr-in-Nice-and-Munich story raises some interesting questions. Is the Mossad so desperate for photographers that they have to keep re-using the same guy even at the risk of blowing the operation? Are they scraping the bottom of the barrel for photo-propagandists, just like for crisis actors?

The Mossad’s motto has traditionally been: BY WAY OF DECEPTION, THOU SHALT DO WAR. But now they aren’t even bothering to try to deceive us. Maybe instead of “by way of deception” they should change it to “by way of chutzpah.”

The Jewish Telegraph Agency’s story on Gutjahr (pegged on a Cynthia McKinney tweet) seems to have been written through the teeth of a pained grimace. It call’s Gutjahr’s presence at both attacks “the photographer’s coincidence.” It explains that:

Dancing Israelis refers to a conspiracy theory that five Israeli men were detained by police in New Jersey on 9/11  after being caught celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Dancing Israelis refers to a conspiracy theory that five Israeli men were detained by police in New Jersey on 9/11  after being caught celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center.

Five minutes of research shows that this “conspiracy theory” is true and thoroughly substantiated by mainstream media and government documents.

The Jewish Telegraph Agency tells us that Guthjahr’s wife and Case Officer Einat Wilf “served in the prestigious Israeli army’s intelligence unit 8200.” Well, it used to be prestigious, anyway. After this, they’re going to have to change their name.

The JTA doesn’t even try to deny that Gutjahr was there, pre-positioned, for both attacks:

Gutjahr tweeted photos from the sites of both attacks, though he later said the Munich photos accidentally were deleted from his camera.”

Gutjahr tweeted photos from the sites of both attacks, though he later said the Munich photos accidentally were deleted from his camera.”

Talk about non-denial denials!

So why do they need a guy like Gutjahr in the first place?

False flag terrorists need to get footage out quickly to shock the public and drive the pre-scripted false narrative deep into the mass mind. Christopher Bollyn, in his contribution to the forthcoming book Orlando False Flag, explains:

In acts of false-flag terrorism the perpetrators behind the deception come out with information very quickly to create a false narrative, which is then spread by the mainstream media.  In the case of the terror attacks of 9/11 this early planting of the false narrative was done by the former Israeli prime minister and chief-of-staff Ehud Barak, who appeared on world-wide BBC World television blaming Osama bin Laden and calling for “an operational, concrete war against terror” – before the Twin Towers had even fallen.

By appearing on BBC World right after the planes had hit the towers, Barak was making use of the primacy effect and presenting the desired narrative first, before any evidence could even be examined to determine what had really happened on 9/11.  In this case, Barak evidently had prior knowledge of the attacks and was prepared to be in the London studio of the BBC World to give the world the Israeli narrative of the crime – and the Israeli cure for the problem:  the global War on Terror, something the Israeli military had been pushing since at least 1979.  Barak’s early analysis became the official version of 9/11, of course.

Due to the primacy effect, Gutjahr’s footage of the truck starting up in Nice, broadcast to the world just minutes after the carnage began, cemented the “ISIS-loving Muslim extremist did it” narrative in the public mind.

Will hanging Gutjahr, Wilf, and their Mossad commanding officers for conspiracy to mass murder undo the propaganda effect and convince people to stop hating Muslims on the basis of false flag crimes committed by their Zionist enemies?

I don’t know, but it’s worth a try, anyway.

Due to ship next week, ORLANDO FALSE FLAG also covers the attacks in Nice and Munich - click HERE to orderDue to ship next week, ORLANDO FALSE FLAG also covers the attacks in Nice and Munich – click HERE to order


Trampling On A Fiery American Flag Outside The DNC Backfires For A Tranny Protester

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Protestor Set On Fire At The DNCCheck this out: the liberal loons outside of the Democratic Convention thought it would be a great idea to set fire to and trample on an American flag. What happened next can only be described as “justice.”

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Samantha Power A Good Girl Gone Bad – How Zionism Turns People Into Mass Murdering Warmongers

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

A Recent Story About Samantha Power

US Slob-Dressed Ambassador Pathetically Excuses Murder in Syria (Video)

Samantha Power would not explain how US planes mistakenly bombed hundreds of civilians, but whined about ‘civil society’ groups. Yet she and Obama are total failures at advancing human rights they claim to champion

By Ricky Twisdale

Apparently thinks the UN is Woodstock

Apparently thinks the UN is Woodstock

Samantha Power is a typical hanger-on of the soon to be gone Obama administration.

Like Obama himself, and democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, she is ostensibly a left-wing socialist, fighter for minority and women’s rights, and anti-war, i.e. a “progressive.”

Yet for the last 4 years as ambassador to the UN, she has unwaveringly defended every violent act of aggression and destabilization abroad which her weak-willed boss Barack (which ironically means “peace”) signed off on.

She did what US representatives do best at the last meeting of the UN security council – obfuscate. But Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin wasn’t having it.

How does murdering thousands of women and children in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine – or sponsoring those who do – advance your progressive cause of minority rights Samantha?

How does destroying billions of dollars of infrastructure and the rule of law in these countries, advance “good governance” and “civil society?”

How does it advance the rights of women and children to obliterate the economies of these nations through US-sponsored wars and coups, so millions of women cannot feed their children, have no hope for a living wage, have no hope for a pension in old age, and so thousands of their husbands and fathers are shot and blow to bits in combat?

I personally witnessed the economic (and political) ruin of Ukraine which the United States backed in 2014. As CIA-stooge big mouth Saakashvili blurted out, it will take Ukraine 20 years to repair the damage done and even equal the economic level it had before Maidan – which already wasn’t that great.

Samantha Power is a ludicrous joke at accomplishing anything except death, destruction, impoverishment and suffering. She is an abject failure at her own professed “progressive” goals. And like her boss and everyone else in the US government, she is a damn liar.

The fact is, Barack Obama and his entire administration are and always were bought and paid for stooges of the financial establishment and military-industiral complex, the “neocons” – in other words, the “elite.” The liberal progressive veneer fools only democratic voters willing to be duped – which apparently is most of them.

Hillary Clinton is Samantha Power on steroids. I tremble for the world with the United States under such “progressive” leadership.

After 4 years, Power can be proud of only one distinction apart from being groped by the Ukrainian ambassador: turning the UN into the Woodstock festival – except with lies, threats of violence and bombs.

Has anybody else ever come to a UN security council meeting dressed like a hippie?

Trump says the US is no longer respected by the world. I wonder why.

Power, Obama, Kerry, Rice, and the rest of their miserable band of blood-soaked hacks should immediately resign – even before Obama’s term expires – and turn themselves over to the International Criminal Court at the Hague. Hillary can join them.

That would do far more to advance global human rights and “civil society” than they have managed to do in eight years of mass murder.

A Story From 2013 About Samantha Power

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Samantha Power: Test Case of Zionist Corruption

Samantha-PowerThe claim by President Barack Obama’s choice as UN ambassador, Samantha Powerthat she would completely endorse the racist, supremacist and murderous state of Israel if appointed to the post, illustrates once again the utterly corrupting influence of the Zionist Lobby in Washington DC.

Only a few years ago, in 2002, when Power was still a minor official, she felt free enough to say that the Jewish lobby was a “domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import” and that the US should transfer its aid payments from Israel to the Palestinians.

Furthermore, she said, this transfer of aid would include the insertion of “a mammoth” and explicitly “military” force into Palestine to protect the Palestinians from Zionist aggression.

Power also blamed Israel for the tactics the U.S. has used in Iraq. She stated that America’s “deference” to Israel has caused us “to replicate Israeli tactics, which, as the war in Lebanon last summer demonstrated, can turn out to be counter-productive.”

In addition, Power also expressed outrage at the way Israel has treated the U.N.’s peacekeepers in South Lebanon, and quoted the statement of Brazilian United Nations diplomat Sergio Vieira De Mello, that the Israelis are “bastards.”

Power also attributed Israel’s incursion into South Lebanon not to the terrorism launched against it from that area, but to the existence of dispossessed Palestinians and Israeli “insecurity.”

Such honesty is rare in Washington DC—and this rarity is there for a reason, as Power’s current (2013) comments show.

The power of the Jewish lobby has been brought to bear on Power, and it has been made clear to her that she stands no chance of being selected as UN ambassador unless she completely changes her tune.

Power has been forced to dismiss her earlier remarks as a “long, rambling and remarkably incoherent answer” to a hypothetical question she shouldn’t have answered.

She has said that if she is confirmed as UN ambassador by the Senate, she will work to eliminate what she calls the United Nations’ “unacceptable bias and attacks” on Israel.

Power told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week that the US has no “greater friend” than the Jewish state.

She criticized the UN for its “disproportionate” focus on Israel and said she would fight to have Israel admitted as a member of the UN Security Council, a post that the Jewish state has been vying for.

“The Security Council seat is one that has eluded Israel, despite its many contributions across the years, and I commit to you wholeheartedly to go on offense, as well as playing defense on the legitimation of Israel, and we’ll make every effort to secure greater integration of Israeli public servants in the U.N. system,” she said.

“The UN must be fair,” Power said. “Israel’s legitimacy should be beyond dispute, and its security must be beyond doubt. And just as I have done as President Obama’s UN adviser at the White House, I will stand up for Israel and work tirelessly to defend it.”

An array of Jewish Supremacist groups — including the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly — have endorsed Power unreservedly.

The corrupting power of the Zionist lobby is clear: threated with the loss of personal career loss and lack of income, Irish-born Power has decided to bow down before the Jewish lobby and betray what she knows to be the truth.

Anyone who wonders about the origin of the overt lying and deception which has become the hallmark of mainstream American politics, need puzzle no longer: the Zionist Supremacists and their death grip over Washington DC lie at the heart of political corruption in our nation.

Samantha Powers is married to Zionist Jew Cass Sunstein who is the Obama Administration’s Information Czar. He wrote an academic paper in 2008 entitled “Conspiracy Theories” in which he called for cognitive infiltration of conspiracy groups by the government.

Watch him dodge questions about some of his alarming beliefs

Merkel Is A Zionist Puppet Destroying Germany With An Open Door Evil Agenda

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

Merkel Is A Zionist PuppetMerkelHasToGo

‘She declared war on own people’: Merkel vows to stick to open door policy, faces online uproar

‘Germany’s online community has been in a furor since Chancellor Merkel said she will still stick to an open door policy for refuges, maintaining Germany is still “safe,” despite the recent deadly attacks there, most of which were committed by migrants.

Merkel acknowledged at a news briefing on Thursday that Islamists could use the refugee flow to infiltrate Germany. She also admitted that even a “powerful country” like Germany “cannot take so many refugees in the long term.”

Yet, at the same time, she made it clear there will be no U-turn in the state’s policies with regard to migrants.’

Read more: ‘She declared war on own people’: Merkel vows to stick to open door policy, faces online uproar

Merkel’s Jews Push Mass Migration


By Brother Nathanael Kapner

THE POWER OF GERMAN JEWRY has Merkel in a box. For what the Jews want, Jews get.

In a Die Welt feature article, “We Jews Know How Bitter Escape Is,” Ronald Lauder of the World Jewish Congress and Dr Josef Schuster of the Central Council of Jews in Germanyattacked Germans who oppose mass migration by non-whites as “neo-nazis.”

Applauding Germany’s progress in developing an “open society,” lauding it as “good for Jewry,” the authors then demanded Merkel to increase the flow of migrants.

Surely, the occupation of Germany by Jewmerica continues as Merkel listens to Jews morethan Germans in her pursuit of mass migration of which seventy percent are single men.

But Lauder and Schuster have a remedy for that.

By subjecting the migrants to a “re-education program” that instills “Germany’s raison d’état” in their souls, the Muslim migrants will be “Germanized” and all will be well.

Problem is, Jewry’s definition of “Germany’s raison d’état” (Read: “Jewry’s national interests”) is support of Israel and assent to the Holocaust narration.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

This is a political ploy to strengthen the bond between “Germans” and “Jews” by using the migrants and their “Arab anti-Semitism” to Jewry’s advantage.

Schuster warned Merkel that “respect for the values enshrined in the Constitution (actually, The Basic Law, there is no Constitution) and agreeing that support for Israel, rejection of anti-Semitism, and remembrance of the Holocaust, is part of Germany’s DNA.”

And Merkel injects the virus and touts the script.

In a televised New Year’s address, Merkel scolded the ‘neo-nazis’ for claiming “Germanness” solely for themselves and excluding others.

Ah, that’s the Jewish line. The devil’s in the definition.

“Germanness,” according to Jewry, has nothing to do with culture, race or religion. It’s only about where you live.

Are you a Muslim living in Berlin? Then you’ll be imbued with “Germanness.” Even with mosques on every corner.

“Americanness,” according to Jewry, has nothing to do with having European roots and 2,000 years of Christian creedal history, but where you live.

Are you a Muslim living in Baton Rouge? Then you’ll be imbued with “Americanness.”

BUT WHAT’S GOOD for the geese is bad for the Jews.

Jews see themselves as JEWS FIRST, and then perchance “merkans” or “chermans.”

(Notice in the title, “Central Council of Jews in Germany,” how they don’t call themselves “Germans” but identify themselves as a nation within a nation.)

Let the fragmented masses take on a national definition, it’s really meaningless. For NO national unity exists when composed of competing minorities.

Only the Jews rise to the top in a splintered society.

And Merkel forces the Jew-ruled Germans to swallow it.

Read More:


Clinton Scandals: IRS Taking A Hard Look At Hillary Clinton And Clinton Foundation

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay


The IRS have Hillary Clinton firmly in their sights as a formal investigation into claims of fraud and corruption within the Clinton Foundation is launched.

The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a “lawless ‘pay-to-play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.” reports:

The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.”

The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside the IRS.

The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a “lawless ‘pay-to-play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.”

Koskinen’s July 22 reply came only a week after the House Republicans contacted the tax agency. It arrived to their offices Monday, the first opening day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

“We have forwarded the information you have submitted to our Exempt Organizations Program in Dallas,” Koskinen told the Republicans.

The Exempt Organization Program is the division of the IRS that regulates the operations of public foundations and charities. It’s the same division that was led by former IRS official Lois Lerner when hundreds of conservative, evangelical and tea party non-profit applicants were illegally targeted and harassed by tax officials.

Blackburn told TheDCNF she believes the IRS has a double standard because, “they would go after conservative groups and religious groups and organizations, but they wouldn’t be looking at the Clinton Foundation for years. It was as if they choose who they are going to audit and question. It’s not right.”

Blackburn said she and her colleagues will “continue to push” for answers on the Clinton Foundation’s governing policies, including its insular board of directors. She said they also will examine conflicts of interest and “follow the money trail.”

“In my opinion, there’s a lack of good governance, there is the appearance of conflicts of interest, and there are continued questions about the financial dealings,” she told TheDCNF.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay

House Republicans singled out Laureate Education and Uranium One as two companies that seemed to have paid lavish sums to the Clintons and later received official government benefits.

Laureate hired former President Bill Clinton as “honorary chancellor,” paying him $16.5 million over five years. The Baltimore-based company, which operates for-profit universities in 28 countries, also donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the foundation’s web site.

While Bill was collecting a paycheck from the company and his wife was secretary of state, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), an arm of the World Bank, invested $150 million in Laureate. It was the largest-ever single IFC investment to an educational company. The United States government is the largest contributor to the IFC. During that same period, the Department of State’s U.S. Agency for International Development awarded $55 million to the International Youth Foundation. Laureate CEO Douglas Becker is on the foundation’s board of directors. International Youth Foundation, the Clinton Foundation and Laureate jointly participated in foundation programs.

A Laureate spokesman denied the quid pro quo charges: “Allegations of any quid pro quo between Laureate, the International Youth Foundation and the Clintons are completely false,” she told TheDCNF, adding, “the IFC’s decision to invest in Laureate had no connection to and was not influenced in any way whatsoever by Hillary Clinton.”

The IFC also awarded $150 million to another company owned by Frank Giustra, a close friend of Bill Clinton. Giustra donated $100 million to create the “Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership” within the Clinton Foundation. The funds went to Pacific Infrastructure, a company in which Giustra had a significant financial stake. The company was to build a port and oil pipeline in Colombia that was strenuously opposed by environmental and human rights groups because the pipeline sliced through five indigenous villages and forcibly displaced the tribes.

Giustra also was an owner in Uranium One, a uranium mining company with operations in Kazakhstan and in the western United States. Giustra wanted to sell a share of the uranium business to Russia’s atomic energy agency, which required U.S. approval, including that of Secretary Clinton. The Russian investment was approved.

Blackburn added that it appeared the Clinton Foundation — which was tax-exempt only to construct and manage Clinton’s presidential library — never got IRS approval to become a tax-exempt global organization with operations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Pacific and the Caribbean.

“In the Clinton Foundation we have a charity that has never filed the appropriate paperwork,” Blackburn charged.

Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst who has been investigating the Clinton Foundation, told TheDCNF that the expansion of the foundation into a global giant was not legally approved by the IRS.

“It’s crystal clear in a review of their application that their purposes were narrowly limited, as they should have been, to a presidential archive in Little Rock, Arkansas,” he said to TheDCNF. “End of discussion.”

Blackburn also questions the makeup of the Clinton Foundation’s board of directors, which IRS rules require include independent, arm’s-length board members. The Clinton Foundation board mainly consists of close friends, business colleagues and big donors to the Clintons, as reported by TheDCNF.

“All charities need to guard against incestuous relationships which limit their ability to be objective,” the congresswoman said. “In the Clinton Foundation, we see a lack of diversity within their board.”

Uranium One did not respond to TheDCNF’s request for comment. The Clinton Foundation also did not respond to TheDCNF’s request for comment.