Tag Archives: JFK

Mysteries: JFK And Other US Presidents Murdered When They Tried To Stop The Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank Scheme

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

JFK Killed After Shutting Down Rothschild’s Federal Reserve; List of US Presidents Murdered by the Rothschild Banking Cartel

Michael Collins Piper: FINAL JUDGEMENT lecture – Mossad connection to JFK Conspiracy


http://americanfreepress.net/PDF/Final_Judgment.pdf

Was Rothschild’s False Israel behind the JFK Assassination to keep Rothschild’s Federal Reserve Bank Scheme in place so they can continue to run the United States by stealth? Did Rothschild’s False Israel kill JFK because he was trying to stop their nuke program?

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Rothschild Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest.

With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress.

We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed this Order, it returned to the United States federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency – money – without going through the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 9.10.08 AM

The Federal Reserve

A myth that all Americans live with is the charade known as the “Federal Reserve.” It comes as a shock to many to discover that it is not an agency of the United States Government.
Since Michael Collins Piper died his books are getting more expensive. You can download the PDF for free. Do so before it is removed from the internet.

The name “Federal Reserve Bank” was designed to deceive, and it still does. It is not federal, nor is it owned by the government. It is privately owned. It pays its own postage like any other corporation. Its employees are not in civil service. Its physical property is held under private deeds, and is subject to local taxation. Government property, as you know, is not.

It is an engine that has created private wealth that is unimaginable, even to the most financially sophisticated. It has enabled an imperial elite to manipulate our economy for its own agenda and enlisted the government itself as its enforcer. It controls the times, dictates business, affects our homes and practically everything in which we are interested.

It takes powerful force to maintain an empire, and this one is no different. The concerns of the leadership of the “Federal Reserve” and its secretive international benefactors appear to go well beyond currency and interest rates.

Executive Order 11,110

President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11,110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.”

This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury‘s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations.

$10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.


The Federal ReserveA myth that all Americans live with is the charade known as the “Federal Reserve.” It comes as a shock to many to discover that it is not an agency of the United States Government.The name “Federal Reserve Bank” was designed to deceive, and it still does. It is not federal, nor is it owned by the government. It is privately owned. It pays its own postage like any other corporation. Its employees are not in civil service. Its physical property is held under private deeds, and is subject to local taxation. Government property, as you know, is not.It is an engine that has created private wealth that is unimaginable, even to the most financially sophisticated. It has enabled an imperial elite to manipulate our economy for its own agenda and enlisted the government itself as its enforcer. It controls the times, dictates business, affects our homes and practically everything in which we are interested.It takes powerful force to maintain an empire, and this one is no different. The concerns of the leadership of the “Federal Reserve” and its secretive international benefactors appear to go well beyond currency and interest rates.Executive Order 11,110President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11,110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.”

This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury‘s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations.

$10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.

Jacob Rothschild

We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order.

They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value.

Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it.

It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new “money”. Executive Order 11,110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 “Silver Certificates” were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Rothschild Federal Reserve’s control over the creation of money.

It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the “powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance”.

On November 22, 1963, JFK was shot dead in Dallas, Texas, in extremely strange circumstances. Phyllis Hall, a nurse who was part of desperate attempts to save the life of President John F Kennedy after he was assassinated has claimed he was shot by a “mystery bullet.” There is also strong evidence involving Lyndon B. Johnson(The following USA President) in the assassination conspiracy.

List of US Presidents Murdered By The Rothschild Banking Cartel

Lincoln’s Private War: The Trail of Blood

Abraham Lincoln worked valiantly to prevent the Rothschild’s attempts to involve themselves in financing the Civil War.

Interestingly, it was the Czar of Russia who provided the needed assistance against the British and French, who were among the driving forces behind the secession of the South and her subsequent financing. Russia intervened by providing naval forces for the Union blockade of the South in European waters, and by letting both countries know that if they attempted to join the Confederacy with military forces, they would also have to go to war with Russia.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

The Rothschild interests did succeed, through their agent Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, to force a bill (the National Banking Act) through Congress creating a federally chartered central bank that had the power to issue U.S. Bank Notes. Afterward, Lincoln warned the American people:

“The money power preys upon the nation in time of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed.”

Lincoln continued to fight against the central bank, and some now believe that it was his anticipated success in influencing Congress to limit the life of the Bank of the United States to just the war years that was the motivating factor behind his assassination.

The Lone Assassin Myth is Born

Modern researchers have uncovered evidence of a massive conspiracy that links the following parties to the Bank of Rothschild: Lincoln’s Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, John Wilkes Booth, his eight co-conspirators, and over seventy government officials and businessmen involved in the conspiracy.

When Booth’s diary was recovered by Stanton’s troops, it was delivered to Stanton. When it was later produced during the investigation, eighteen pages had been ripped out. These pages, containing the aforementioned names,were later found in the attic of one of Stanton’s descendants.

From Booth’s trunk, a coded message was found that linked him directly to Judah P. Benjamin, the Civil War campaign manager in the South for the House of Rothschild. When the war ended, the key to the code was found in Benjamin’s possession.

The assassin, portrayed as a crazed lone gunman with a few radical friends, escaped by way of the only bridge in Washington not guarded by Stanton’s troops.

“Booth” was located hiding in a barn near Port Royal, Virginia, three days after escaping from Washington. He was shot by a soldier named Boston Corbett, who fired without orders. Whether or not the man killed was Booth is still a matter of contention, but the fact remains that whoever it was, he had no chance to identify himself.

It was Secretary of War Edwin Stanton who made the final identification. Some now believe that a dupe was used and that the real John Wilkes Booth escaped with Stanton’s assistance.

Mary Todd Lincoln, upon hearing of her husband’s death, began screaming, “Oh, that dreadful house!” Earlier historians felt that this spontaneous utterance referred to the White House. Some now believe it may have been directed to Thomas W. House, a gun runner, financier, and agent of the Rothschild’s during the Civil War, who was linked to the anti-Lincoln, pro-banker interests.

Andrew Jackson

Andrew Jackson was the first President from west of the Appalachians. He was unique for the times in being elected by the voters, without the direct support of a recognized political organization.

He vetoed the renewal of the charter for the Bank of the United States on July 10, 1832.

In 1835, President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:

“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”

There followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson’s life. Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren,

“The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me.”

Was this the beginning of a pattern of intrigue that would plague the White House itself over the coming decades? Was his (and Lincoln’s) death related by an invisible thread to the international bankers?

James Garfield

President James Abram Garfield, our 20th President, had previously been Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations and was an expert on fiscal matters.

(Upon his election, among other things, he appointed an unpopular collector of customs at New York, whereupon the two Senators from New York – Roscoe Conkling and Thomas Platt – resigned their seats).

President Garfield openly declared that whoever controls the supply of currency would control the business and activities of all the people.

After only four months in office, President Garfield was shot at a railroad station on July 2, 1881. Another coincidence.

The Trail of Blood Continues

In the 70’s and 80’s, Congressman Larry P. McDonald spearheaded efforts to expose the hidden holdings and intentions of the international money interests. His efforts ended on August 31, 1983, when he was killed when Korean Airlines 007 was “accidentally” shot down in Soviet airspace. A strange coincidence, it would seem.

Senator John Heinz and former Senator John Tower had served on powerful Senate banking and finance committees and were outspoken critics of the Federal Reserve and the Eastern Establishment. On April 4, 1991, Senator John Heinz was killed in a plane crash near Philadelphia. On the next day, April 5, 1991, former Senator John Tower was also killed in a plane crash. The coincidences seem to mount.

Attempts to just audit the Federal Reserve continue to meet with failure. It is virtually impossible to muster support for any issue that has the benefit of a media blackout.

(The bizarre but tragic reality that the American people suffer from a managed and controlled media is a subject for another discussion.)

Beginning of a Series

For many years, numerous authors have attempted to sound the alarm that there exists a hidden “shadow government” that actually rules America. Most of us have dismissed these “conspiracy theory” views as extremist and unrealistic. However, when I had the opportunity to have lunch with Otto von Habsburg, member of the European Parliament, he made two remarks that caught my attention.

The first was: “The ignorance in America is overwhelming.” Indeed, the contrast in general awareness of world affairs between the average American and the average European is striking.

It was his second observation that really provoked me: “The concentration of power in America is frightening.

As a reasonably circumspect senior executive, having spent three decades in international finance and viewing America as a broadly based representative democracy, his remark shocked me. It prompted me to do some more homework. The results of my inquiries are most disturbing.

Article by Politicalvelcraft and Rense; | References: Wardner, James W., The Planned Destruction of America; Roberts, Craig, Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza

Ex-Chief Of Mossad Says World Better Not Pry Into Who They Assassinate And Pull Trigger On

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder


World better not pry into how we decide to pull trigger on someone – ex-chief of Mossad

By Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor Veterans Today

Ex-Mossad Efraim Halevy

Ex-Mossad Efraim Halevy

… from Russia Today, Moscow

[ Editor’s Note: It’s always a treat to get an interview with these ex-Mossad chief’s as they have a history of being very outspoken, which we rarely see among the Western ones. The only thing we get better than this is something like the rare gem The Gatekeepers amazing documentary where the filmmaker Dror Moreh got the ex-Shin Bet heads to interview about their handling the occupation with its stunning revelations.

At VT we sometimes have had personal contacts at this level, but not the freedom to make films about them or print interviews, so we like to share what we find that has been, where you get to read gems like this:

“I mean that intelligence is not a science. I believe that intelligence is an art, and therefore, just as there’s no orderly way to paint a picture, so there’s no orderly way to carry out intelligence, because every intelligence operation is an operation in itself, and one operation does not compare or is similar to any other.”… Jim W. Dean ]

____________

– First published … December 19, 2016 –

In a world where terrorism can strike at any moment – where terrorists resort to stabbing, ramming attacks, and mass shooting – no one is safe from the threat of extremism. Recent terrorist attacks in Europe highlight the need to ramp up security – and many are pointing to Israel as a model. Surrounded by hostile countries and conflict zones, Israel has managed to contain the extremist threat.

The Israeli Mossad is one of planet’s top intelligence agencies and is known for its relentless pursuit of terrorists. How does Israel’s mighty intelligence apparatus work against terrorism? How can peace be kept in a country where the enemy is waiting around every corner? We lift the lid on the counter-terrorism methods used by one of the world’s top spy agencies with a former director of the Mossad – Efraim Halevy.

Sophie Shevardnadze: Efraim Halevy, the former director of Israel’s powerful intelligence agency, the Mossad, ex-head of Israel’s National Security Council – welcome to the show, it’s really great to have you with us. Now, Mr. Halevy you say there’s no such thing as an orderly way to carry out intelligence. Does this mean there’s no laws, no rules of conduct for intelligence gathering?

Efraim Halevy: Intelligence is one of the oldest professions in the world, but there’s no law book concerning intelligence, there are no agreed rules on intelligence, and despite that, intelligence is a main player in the international relations and in domestic relations.

SS: Yeah, but okay, but when you say there’s no such thing as an orderly way to carry out intelligence – what exactly do you mean?

EH: I mean that intelligence is not a science. I believe that intelligence is an art, and therefore, just as there’s no orderly way to paint a picture, so there’s no orderly way to carry out intelligence, because every intelligence operation is an operation in itself, and one operation does not compare or is similar to any other.

SS:How does intelligence gathering against terrorism work? Are terrorist groups being infiltrated, are undercover agents working among terrorists?

EH: All of the methods used by the intelligence over the years are employed. Most certainly, you have agents undercover, most certainly you have electronic intelligence with all of the new developments in that field. Every element that you have in modern day information technology is used and is employed in intelligence. By the way, not only by intelligence agencies, but also by groups like ISIS and Hezbollah.

SS:You know, I’m particularly interested in undercover agent work. How do you gain the trust of a radical group? I mean, it must be hard to infiltrate IS, for example.

EH: I’m sure it is difficult to infiltrate the Islamic State, but there you’re going to question their motivation. What motivates somebody who is in the Islamic State to cooperate? And I should imagine, probably, the major motivation is disgust with the methodology used by the Islamic State, not only in treating its enemies, but also treating some of its own people.

SS:So, are you saying that people that are part of the Islamic State are appalled by their own methods, but they can’t leave because if they leave they are going to die? So, they choose to cooperate?

EH: I believe, that, probably – I am only surmising, I’ve not been there for quite some time, so I can only surmise – I believe that many of the people who cooperate, cooperate because they’re unable to leave and, on the other hand, they feel that they are not of their own will involved in the big effort of…shall we say, of evil, which has to be overcome – and they want to contribute their part to this.

SS:Alright, so I get your first point: in order to infiltrate an organisation like ISIS you’ve got to find someone who is appalled by their own methods – but once you infiltrate, if your undercover agent gains the trust, right, of the terrorist cell – will he have to do as the others do? For example, I don’t know, behead someone? Is this expected of the agent?

EH: I think I cannot give an exact answer to that, and I don’t believe anybody has the right answer to that. But I believe that in the end, in order to achieve the ultimate aim, sometimes, along the way, we have to do things which normally we would not like to do.

SS: The intelligence has helped curb the amount of bombings that are happening in Israel, but what’s the use of it when people resort to stabbings or drive-by shootings?

EH: I believe – and it’s my personal view – that it’s wrong to call stabbings “terrorism”. I believe, terrorism is something more organized, is part of a larger movement. Stabbings and similar events are individual reactions to what is happening and what is perceived in one way or another as threatening the fabric and society, of the people who are doing the stabbings, and therefore they carry it out. The general word, the general term of “terrorism”, although it’s applied to that, is not a terrorism which can be codified like organisations like ISIS or organisation like Hamas or organisation like Hezbollah.

SS: How can such attackers with no formal ties to any terrorist groups be caught before they act?

EH: It is a serious problem. I think no formula has been found for that and therefore, an individual who decides on his own to carry out a terrorist act, if he’s careful and if he knows how to operate, most probably, will be able to arrive on the scene. But there are a lot of methods and ways of monitoring central areas, main highways, transportation systems and so forth, so sometimes you catch these people as they are on their way.

SS: You’ve seen Mossad operate abroad, doing “normal” intelligence work like spying, surveillance – but also undertakes targeted assassinations of terrorist leaders. How do you decide when to pull the trigger on someone? When is enough enough for Mossad?

EH: I don’t personally wish to go into this field of when we make a decision to remove somebody to a better world. I think, the international society would be better served by not prying into this unnecessarily. You will not find, I believe, any intelligence officer, either side of the divide in this world of ours, who will want to talk about it, and I want to keep my hands clean on that. As I said, I don’t want to say that we make such decisions – I don’t want to go into the details of how we decide, how we carry out operations, which operations are carried out, which are not. I think, it would be better for the peace and tranquility of the international society to leave these questions unanswered.

SS: Sure. America looks to use drones when taking out terrorists. Does Mossad uses drones too, or it only works the old fashioned way, with agents on the ground?

EH: Mossad has all the means and all the methodologies which are used in intelligence in modern day life. Mossad is at the forefront of the technology, in all the fields that you can think of, and I think that Mossad has done extremely well in developing some of the more advanced types of weaponry and systems which carry weaponry.

SS: When one of Mossad’s most infamous operations – the attempted assassination of Hamas leader Khaled Mashal went wrong – you played an active part in regulating the situation after. Two Mossad agents were captured and Israel managed to get them back. If an operation like that backfires, does Mossad try and get its agents back at all costs?

EH: The word “all costs”, I think, is not the right term to use. It is true that I’ve played a very central role in solving the problem which arose as a result of an operation which did not reach successful conclusion in 1997, and in that area, I performed the role of a special emissary, action on behalf of the Prime Minister of Israel at a time, who was Mr. Netanyahu in his first term, and I did not wish to reach a point in which “all costs” are paid in order to get the result. I think we had to get a result which would make it a win-win situation, in other words, when both we and those who have been wronged by us, would emerge from the situation with a feeling and a public aura of having been successful.

SS:Mossad is known to go after perpetrators of terrorist attacks anywhere they escape – Mossad’s special unit, the Kidon, is responsible for that – this tactic may work for revenge, but does it deter terrorists from striking again?

EH: Look, I don’t want to talk about deterrence, because in the end, let us be frank with ourselves – we have not reached a point in which we can say that actions we have taken have ‘deterred terrorism’. I think that the word “deterrence” is a word, or a theme which should be forgotten in dealing with these matters. What we can do is to destroy capabilities, what we can do is to get the other side to realize that the pain of continuing what they’re doing would be insufferable for them. If that is called a deterrence, then yes, deterrence. But if you look at things in the Middle East, if you look at the way the relations of Israel and its neighbors have revolved on terrorism – when it comes to organized terrorism, I am not talking about small groups, organized terrorism, like Hezbollah, like Hamas – what we have achieved, is, I think, a mutual deterrence and not just deterrence.

SS:But, in order to stop a terrorist you need to put fear in him – how do you put fear in people who are willing to blow themselves up?

EH: I think, the use of the term “fear” is misplaced. We don’t want to get the other side to fear, we want the other side to take a logical approach, which leads it to the conclusion that the price that would be paid is not a price which they would wish to pay. In other words, we have to make the price such that the other side does not think it’s worth its while to pay it.

SS:Are cyber warfare tools part of Mossad arsenal? Like trojan worms, viruses, etc?

EH: I’m not permitted to refer to any specific means that is in our arsenal. I’m sorry, I know it’s interesting, but I cannot relate to that.

SS:It truly is. Just tell me in general – do cyber tools make spying easier? Or the amount of information to process it is just too big to manage?

EH: There’s nothing too big to manage, and I don’t want to go into details of the cyber warfare – it is something which is being, I think, used, and exploited around the world, and this is something which a great threat to international security in the end – because, once you begin a major confrontation in the cyber field, the penalty for all those players who will be involved in it would be enormous.

SS:Now, it’s no secret that Mossad recruits some of its agents online – you can fill out an application form on the web site. You were the first one to institute this practice, like you’ve said – how does this process work? If you like a candidate you do just invite him over for an interview? How successful has been recruitment process for agents?

EH: First of all, let me say, you are right, I was the first one who put Mossad on the Net, and there was enormous opposition to that in the Mossad, people thought that I was doing the wrong thing. Now, of course, you cannot imagine without it. Obviously, this is only a first step in recruiting somebody, it’s a method of casting net as wide as possible, and once you reach a stage in which you want to actually decide whether to recruit somebody or not, you don’t do it by correspondence, you do it by face-to-face contact.

SS:But, who do you pull in more – people from the web or just people that you see in the streets and you approach them?

EH: I don’t know, and I don’t think any statistics are drawn up in this field. I think we recruit people from all ways of getting it to people, all methods of communication, and in the end, we have as wide as possible choice as one can hope for.

SS:Social media like Facebook and Twitter, they have turned into a platform for terrorists to incite violence. They spread radical ideas and exchange plans. Is this cyber-terrorism the world is facing a new kind and will it be in the future?

EH: It’s not the future, I think it is the present – and yes, one of the things we have to take into account is that the terrorist groups use these methods and these tools for their own vile deeds. I can tell you that without the use of Internet, the attack on the U.S. on 9/11 would not have been possible. This all was organized through IT means and methods, and the road from that to other ways of carrying out warfare, like cyber warfare and so forth, are at a disposal of terrorist groups, and they have used it in some areas, some cases, almost to perfection.

SS: ‘Lone-wolf’ terrorist attacks – when people act on their own, without the assistance of a group but inspired a radical ideology – they are becoming more frequent, you’ve faced them in Israel and Europe has witnessed a whole series of such attacks over the past year. Is there a direct link between online incitement and lone wolf attacks? Since the internet provides easy and fast access to radical ideas..

EH: It would not be useful to attribute too much to the methodology. What we’re witnessing in the XXI century is widespread understanding that individuals and small groups can use the means at a disposal of states and of state organs, no less than the state organs. That is something which is troubling, and that is one of the aspects that people have to take into account when they’re putting together means of preventing penetration and ways and means of sabotaging the capabilities of intelligence and state organs all around the world.

SS:Can social media actually help uncover terrorist plots or find potential terrorists through tracing of their online activity? Are there special intelligence units monitoring online interactions?

EH: Without going to any details and I will not do that, I believe that the only way to give sufficient protection in this world of XXI century is to try and to cover all ways and means of IT traffic. Now, this is something, of course, which is enormous, because every year, it increases exponentially. So you have to have ways and means of prioritizing what you’re doing and to be able to get to what you need in orderly and in a scientific way – this is an enormous challenge and I think that intelligence and other security agencies all around the world are devoting a lot of effort to try and to find ways and means of prioritizing what they’re doing so that they would get to what they need to get.

SS: The Knesset has recently adopted an anti-terror bill, giving sweeping surveillance powers to security forces. Now in a democratic state, the right not to be searched, spied on, arrested at will is fundamental – but in the face of terrorism what’s a way out of this democratic dilemma?

EH: What has to be clear is that in this state that we’re at the moment, until the international climate changes, international social behaviour changes, we will have to be careful in the degree of freedom which social and other nets are allowed to operate. There’s no way of otherwise doing this. There’s a clash between those who wish to have an entirely liberal system of life, way of life, and those who understand that in order to be able to protect societies and states effectively you have to have, at least temporarily, capability of covering certain types of activities with means which were not used until recently.

SS:In Israel there are checkpoints in every gate in every town, security is tight everywhere, yet you move around the big cities without much delay, and the measures aren’t annoying or too constraining. How do you do it?

EH: First of all, I invite you to visit Israel – you will come to major cities and will not notice checkpoints on every street, on every corner…



SS: That is exactly my question – how do you do it? I know there are checkpoints but we don’t notice them.

EH: How do we do it… I won’t say that there are checkpoints but you don’t notice them – there are no checkpoints, period. It’s not checkpoints you don’t notice… there are other means of surveilling areas – there’s electronic surveillance, there’s photographic surveillance – various means of surveillance, and this allows people of Israel to conduct their way of life without any real restriction. Therefore, if you come to the cities, like in Tel-Aviv, from which I’m broadcasting now, or in Jerusalem, even, where there’s more tension, or in other cities throughout the country, you will not find an immediate presence and the sense of a presence of a security capability which covers everything. It s done in a more discreet way, and it is very effective.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

SS:Western states today are facing the kind of terrorism Israel has been living with for decades. Is the constant threat of terrorism a new normal for the West?

EH: I think the threat of terrorism is not only a threat to the West, it’s a threat to all over. There have been terrorist attacks in other areas of the world, including Eastern Europe, including Russia. Russia has also experienced terrorism in recent years. I remember when I was head of the Mossad there was a major terrorist attack on a theater in Moscow – and this was a very-very highly reported event. So terrorism is like a disease, it cannot be restricted by borders and geography – therefore, I think, there’s a growing understanding, that in order to be able to deal with this, the more genuine cooperation can be achieved, everybody will benefit, all sides will benefit from such a cooperation.

SS:EU’s migrant crisis is making it more vulnerable to terrorism – a Syrian refugee was arrested in Germany in October for planning a major terrorist attack. Now Israel accepts almost no refugees – is that the only way to ensure public safety isn’t compromised?

EH:The reason we do not receive refugees is… we are a country which was born as a result of major international events and had to absorb hundreds of thousands of millions of our own people who were scattered around the world and therefore, we are not in a position to receive large numbers of refugees.

SS: Yeah, but my question really was – should we not accept refugees anywhere if we want no terrorism on grounds of our country? I am talking about refugees from war-torn countries, like Syria, Libya.

EH:I think you have to be very careful in going through a system of finding out whether there are no infiltrations of terrorists in this way, as well. There has to be a method to do this, and I think it has be deemed in quantity.

SS: Alright, Mr. Halevy, thank you very much for this interesting interview, for this insight that you gave us. We were talking to Efraim Halevy, the former director of Mossad and also the former head of the Israeli National Security Council, discussing Israel’s counter-terror expertise and how it can help the fight against terrorism across the world. That’s it for this edition of SophieCo, I will see you next time. Read More

Related Articles

Mordechai Vanunu and Michael Collins Piper Converge:

 The Israeli Mossad Assassinated JFK

by Mark Dankof

The American news media, for all the usual and most obvious reasons, has systematically ignored the most explosive news story in years, made all the more relevant by the countdown to further conflict in the Middle East as credible rumors continue to surface that Israel and the United States are planning an act of preemptive war against Iran in coming months.

The story, which appeared in the Express Newspapers of India on Monday, July 26th, quotes Israeli nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu as crediting the Israeli Mossad with the assassination of President Kennedy. Even more incredibly, Vanunu states specifically that the motive for the assassination of Kennedy on the part of the Israeli government was related to the American President’s insistence that the Zionist State come clean about its nuclear program at the infamous Dimona plant in the Negev desert.

Vanunu was released by the Israeli authorities in April after 18 years imprisonment for a treason conviction related to the disclosure of state secrets regarding the Israelis’ nuclear program. His sensational public charge about the involvement of the Mossad in the Kennedy murder might simply be relegated to the realm of the utterances of a disgruntled or imbalanced man, except for one additional item.

Michael Collins Piper, the author of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, has made a previous case for Israel’s direct involvement in the Dealey Plaza murder of John Kennedy on November 22, 1963 that is both plausible and compelling. The Vanunu account simply underscores and corroborates the case Piper made originally over a decade ago. The converging accounts of the two men are most disturbing.

Piper tells the reader of Final Judgment that 1963 proved to be a pivotal year in a publicly unreported conflict between America’s 35th President and Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, principally over Israel’s failure to submit its Dimona operation to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection, and secondarily to a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians. He subsequently proceeds to discuss the principle alleged players in the assassination plot itself in a way which corroborates the research of such respected Kennedy assassination scholars as the UK’s Anthony Summers and University of Texas professor Jim Marrs. Readers of the work of Summers and Marrs will be intimately familiar with names like Sam Giancana, Johnny Roselli, Carlos Marcello, Guy Banister, William Harvey, William Sullivan, George de Mohrenschildt, James Jesus Angleton, Richard Helms, Alpha 66, and Santos Trafficante. Typically, the demonstrated links of these individuals with organized crime syndicates, the anti-Castro Cuban exilic community of the early 1960s, and an element of the Central Intelligence Agency involved with the first two groups, has resulted in past tentative conclusions that the crux of the plot that took Mr. Kennedy’s life involved a convergence of interest of these three (3) key constituencies involved in a sordid triumvirate deliberately concealed from the American public 40 years ago by the Warren Commission.

Piper does not discredit this conclusion reached by his predecessors in their research of the circumstances that led specific individuals to participate in a plot to kill the President. He simply demonstrates what has been hidden from view before now: that those fingered by the meticulous academic research of Summers, Marrs, and others, have even deeper demonstrable associations with the Israeli lobby and Israeli intelligence.

Final Judgment’s case in this regard is principally built on the key significance of Meyer Lansky as the real power player in American organized crime in the 1950s and 1960s, the superior of Giancana, Roselli, Marcello, Mickey Cohen, Mickey Weiner, Moe Dalitz, Frank Costello, and others previously mentioned as participants in the Kennedy conspiracy. In turn, Lansky’s role as a committed Zionist and fund-raiser for the State of Israel involved direct, palpable links between his criminal empire, his Miami-based banks, and the Banque de Credit International (BCI) in Geneva, Switzerland. This latter entity served as the European-based money laundering center for Mr. Lansky’s global activities. BCI in turn, was headed up by an Israeli banker, Tibor Rosenbaum, former Director for Finances and Supply for the Israeli Mossad. Piper then demonstrates that BCI was a chief share holder in a Rome-based corporation called CMC/Permindex, whose chairman of the board was none other than Louis M. Bloomfield of Montreal, Canada, a major fund-raiser for Israel and known asset for Israeli intelligence. CMC/Permindex, in turn, proves to be a major point of intersection which brings the shadowy Bloomfield into direct or indirect contact with Clay Shaw (the chief target of the Jim Garrison JFK investigation in New Orleans), Guy Banister, James Jesus Angleton, FBI Division 5 chief William Sullivan (who spearheaded the FBI investigation for the Warren Commission and served as FBI liaison and friend of Angleton), ex-Cuban President Carlos Prio Socarras (provable gun-running business partner of Oswald assassin Jack Ruby), Ernest Israel Japhet (chairman and president of Israeli Bank Leumi), Shaul Eisenberg (a key figure in Israel’s nuclear bomb development and participant with Rosenbaum in the Swiss-Israel Trade Bank), elements of the French nationalist Secret Army Organization (OAS), CIA agent Theodore Shackley (the CIA’s chief of station in Miami during the CIA-Lansky assassination plots against Fidel Castro), and Abe Feinberg, New York Jewish businessman used by Ben Gurion as the liaison for secret meetings with President Kennedy to resolve the dispute of the latter two over Dimona. It is thus the BCI and CMC/Permindex players and links which Piper employs to show that the players, alliances, and assets were firmly in place to bring those with motive, means, and opportunity together in a plot which culminated in Dallas.

Secondarily, Piper buttresses his case by showing the results for Israel subsequent to the tragedy in Dallas in November of 1963. The removal of Kennedy brought an end to American demands for IAEA inspections of the Israeli nuclear program, and the ascension to the White House of Lyndon Johnson, whose long ties to Meyer Lansky and Carlos Marcello had assisted the barefoot boy of the Texas Hill Country in his arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. More significantly, Johnson’s arrival in the Oval Office represented a sea change in American Middle Eastern policy, establishing for Piper the Israel-First direction of every American Chief Executive from LBJ onward, to the detriment of the independence of the American government from the undue influence of the Israeli lobby, the maintenance of regional peace and stability in the most dangerous area of the globe, and any vestiges of hope for positive American political relationships with the Islamic world.

The Vanunu-Piper allegations about Israel will not go away. The revelations of direct Israeli connections to key members of the Neo-Conservative foreign policy team of George W. Bush most desirous of conflict with Iraq; the virtual ownership of the United States Congress by the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC); and the sycophancy of John Kerry toward these same interests, will culminate in a political boiling point in the United States if an expanded American involvement in a Middle Eastern war, the re-institution of an American Draft, and further instances of Middle East-related terrorism in the American homeland end up being connected by the public to the interests of Israel and Zionism and not those of the United States. Further exposure and corroboration of the Vanunu-Piper charges that the Israeli government was the driving force behind the death of John F. Kennedy–in conjunction with further exposure of Tel Aviv’s ongoing manipulation of the American government and media in issues of War and Empire–will commence a mass revolt against the policy elites that neither Tel Aviv nor Washington will be able to contain or control.

Between now and the first Tuesday in November, the policy elites will do their best to conceal fair disclosure and debate over who controls the present process and benefits by it. Suppression of information will be their modus operandi. Bush, Kerry, and their respective pals in Corporate America and Big Media will do their best to obfuscate the truth, ignore the discussion of the core issues of War and Peace, and hide the real identity of their financiers and handlers through such information suppression. Suppressing any serious examination or dissemination of the Vanunu-Piper case against Israel is already a done deal. It is a real shame. Pity us, the “free” American Republic, that no one will ask our two Presidential aspirants some pressing questions in the days ahead, including what they think of the following Presidential document from 41 years ago.

July 5, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Levi Eshkol of Israel):

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.

You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits [i.e.: inspections] to Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27th. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s willingness to permit periodic visits [inspections] to Dimona.

I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion’s May 27th letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.

I am sure you will agree that these visits should be nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27th letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,

 

John F. Kennedy

Assassination Of President McKinley Was By Jews!

By Brother Nathanael Kapner – Why I Left Judaism

THE JEWISH HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD  had lost a fierce battle with President Jackson with regard to keeping their Central Bank. For in 1834, Jackson removed all government deposits from the Rothschild’s “Second Bank of the United States.” 

A new System of National Banks was established in 1862 eliminating the Jew-controlledCentral Bank up through 1901. It was on September 6 1901 that President William McKinley was assassinated through the intrigues of the Rothschilds and their hit-men.

With McKinley out of the way, the path to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was easily paved through the pawns of Jewish agents of the House of Rothschild. Two such Rothschild agents were the powerful Jewish bankers Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg.

President William McKinley was known as a “hard money” man. This was because he advocated a gold standard. Unlike his opponent, William Jennings Bryan, McKinley was against “easy money” with no backing — printed by Jewish lenders at interest to the borrower – namely the US government. This was the essence of McKinley’s 1896 & 1900 successful campaign against William Jennings Bryan who advocated for “free and unlimited coinage of silver.”

BUT BY McKINLEY FIGHTING AGAINST “easy money,” (translate Jew-coined & printed-at-interest money) McKinley sealed his death warrant. A death warrant signed, sealed, and delivered by the powerful House Of Rothschild, criminals in bankers’ suits.

THE ROOSEVELT-JEWISH CONNECTION
THE NEW YORK JEWISH CROWD WANTED Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt to be President. The Roosevelts were a wealthy group of NY socialites. Theodore Roosevelt Sr. (”Teddy” Roosevelt’s father) inherited the multi-million dollar family business, “Roosevelt & Son,” importers of plate glass. 

Through his many Jewish business connections, Theodore Roosevelt Sr. founded the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the American Museum of Natural History, and the New York Children’s Orthopedic Hospital. All of these institutions were and are Jew-intensive.

Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt had been groomed by the powerful NY Jewish political machine to be the Governor of NY and future President of the United States. In 1900, McKinley was forced by Republican partisans of the Jews to appoint “Teddy” Roosevelt as Vice President to get the “Jewish vote.” McKinley’s appointment of Roosevelt soon turned out to be his demise.

ENTER JEW COMMUNIST-ANARCHISTS
EMMA GOLDMAN & LEON CZOLGOSZ
JEWS SWARMED OUT OF POLAND AND RUSSIA beginning in the 1880’s.

ON SEPTEMBER 6 1901, a 28 year old Polish Jew, Leon Czolgosz, walked into the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo NY where McKinley was speaking and shot McKinley twice in the abdomen at point blank range. McKinley died a week later and “Teddy” Roosevelt was sworn in as President, much to the delight of the NY Jews.

Prior to the assassination, Leon Czolgosz had fallen in with Emma Goldman’s Jewish anarchist crowd at Sach’s Cafe on Suffolk Street, their headquarters in New York City’s Lower East Side. (NYC’s Lower East Side was where Trotsky, owing to Jacob Schiff’s financial support, had recruited many communist Jews to travel with him to Russia to incite the October Revolution of 1917.)

Emma Goldman’s crowd had broken away from main-line socialists who were “under the eye of a paternal government.” Instead, Goldman’s crowd preached that social change could only be achieved through violence and assassinations. They preached that capitalists would never change on their own volition. Thus it was here at Sach’s Cafe that the assassination plot against President McKinley, a “capitalist,” was hatched.

One member of Emma Goldman’s group, the Jew, Julius Edelson, was quoted by the NY police as saying to them:

— “No matter how much Czolgolz has been damned for his good work, we know that he was a great man. He was a true hero.” — See: “Anarchists Attack Police” Here

And not only this, but the Jew, Emma Goldman, is extolled by Jewry as a “heroine” — even though she preached violence to attain her anarchist aims as recorded in The Jewish Women Archives:

— “Emma Goldman refused to condemn Czolgosz and other like-minded individuals who were driven to acts of violence against representatives of the capitalist system. Emma Goldman admired the sensitivity that led Czolgosz to this extreme.” —

Indeed – in Emma Goldman’s autobiography, Living My Life, when describing her arrest after McKinley’s assassination, she wrote, “My sympathies were with Czolgosz.”

See: Emma Goldman’s Use Of Violence-Tragedy At Buffalo, October 6 1901Here. (Click On “Full Image” & Scroll Down)

FOUR DAYS AFTER Czolgosz’ assassination of McKinley, on September 10 1901, Emma Goldman was arrested (but released!) in Chicago under suspicion of corroborating in President McKinley’s assassination. She was arrested many times prior to and after this arrest for “inciting to riot and violence.” Here

EMMA GOLDMAN & HER JEWISH ANARCHIST LOVER
ALEXANDER BERKMAN
GOLDMAN’S LOVER WAS ANOTHER Jewish communist-anarchist by the name of Alexander Berkman. Berkman was imprisoned in 1892 for his attempted assassination of the steel magnate, Henry Clay Frick.

Emma Goldman assisted Berkman in his attempted assassination of Frick by obtaining a pistol for him to use Here (1st paragraph) And: Here. But at the trial Berkman refused to testify against his Jewish-communist lover, Emma Goldman.

Goldman visited Berkman in prison where they talked about their future anarchist plans Here. Both Goldman and Berkman were associated with the “Haymarket Anarchists,” a group led by 8 Jewish communists who threw a bomb into a crowd which killed 7 police officers during their Chicago anarchist rally in 1886 Here.

Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, being communists, were most likely funded by the powerful communist-supporter, Jacob Schiff, the renowned Jewish banker of Kuhn Loeb, who funded the burgeoning Bolshevik movement in Russia.

Through Emma Goldman’s association with Schiff, and other powerful Jews, she was *never* charged with her numerous crimes which included her role in the McKinley assassination as well as inciting violence against American police.

Eventually Emma Goldman was finally deported to Russia where she joined the Bolsheviks and later assisted them in inciting the communist rebels against the Christian loyalists in the Spanish Civil War.

 

Do You Remember The Times Jewish Conspirators Assassinated US Presidents And Other World Leaders?

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

Assassinated US PresidentsDo You Remember The Times Jewish Conspirators Assassinated US Presidents And Other World Leaders?

By Jack Allen

When I started to notice in our current time, that there seems to be one group of people that seems not to have any regard for human life what so ever. I started to have questions. Let us look at Israel for an example and see all the crimes they do. Yes, we can call this a Jewish state and we can see innocent Palestinian children, women and being killed daily and their property being taken away. There is a Genocide going on just like the Ukrainian Holocaust (Holodomor) and the Armenian Holocaust that Jews were behind. We know Stalin and his Bolshevik Jews were the biggest mass murderers in history.

Now let us look at the Jewish Neocons and Zionist Puppet Politicians in the US today, they have a crazy war and death lust. They don’t care if innocent people are killed along with whoever they say is a terrorist around the world. They just create lies and do false flags to manipulate the public to support their Satanic evil.

If you see any politician around the world that is pushing for wars that seem to benefit Israel or the Central Bank scheme you know that politician is a Zionist puppet. So with that said, let us look at some scary history about assassinations and see an interesting common denominator.

Former Jews and Honorable Jews have pointed out this same information throughout the years, so all Jews of course are not responsible for the actions of others in their group. This is just about exposing evil, that if not stopped will destroy the planet.

The Satanic system that these evil people are trying to build through assassinations and usury schemes needs to be exposed.

Things are getting worse not better with these control freaks and nations are being dismantled by forced immigration and multiculturalism . There is an attempt to create a debt slave worldwide population that will be manipulated and controlled every moment of their lives. Maybe this video about the Talmud has the answer.

The Talmud Unmasked~ The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Non-Jews



Video: Judaism = Zionism = Satanism? Judaism Exposed! Texe Marrs


JEWISH POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS

The Jewish conspirators have committed several major political assassinations. These assassinations change history and destabilize nations.

* King Louis of France and Marie Antoinette in 1793

JUDEO MASONRY INCITES THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 came about under the influence of Judeo Masonry and the subversive society behind it known as the Illuminati. This is now an established fact.

Seeing that the Jews obtained emancipation in France only 2 years after the Revolution and that the new Social Order imposed by the Revolution summed up in the catch-cry “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” (an impossible and contradictory ideology), was based upon Jewish Anti-Christian principles unheard of in Christian Europe, it is necessary to see what relationship the wealthy Jews of the time had with regard to the outbreak. Source

Thus the Jewish financiers behind the 1789 French Revolution are as follows:

Chaim Veitel Ephraim (1703-1775): Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick the Great.

Daniel Itzig (1722-1799): Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick William II.

Hertzel Cerfbeer (1730-1793): France, Jewish financier of the French army.

Mayer Amschel Rothshchild (1744-1812): Frankfurt, Jewish Money Lender.

Benjamin Goldsmid (1755-1808): London, William Pitt’s financier.

Abraham Goldsmid(1756-1810): London, Benjamin Goldsmid’s brother.

Moses Mocatta(1768-1857): London, partner of the Goldsmids and uncle of Sir Moses Montefiore.

These Jews & All Of Their Jewish Compatriots Are Guilty Of The Righteous Blood
Of The Holy Monarchs Of France, King Louis XVI & Queen Marie Antoinette!

Source

* American president Abraham Lincoln in 1865

John Wilkes Booth Was Jewish

John Wilkes Booth was a Jew.

Quote

John Wilkes Booth, assassin of Lincoln, was half Jewish.

Booth’s Sister says they are half Jewish

In the book, John Wilkes Booth – A Sister’s Memoir by Asia Booth, it is revealed that John Wilkes Booth’s father, Junius Brutus Booth, was Jewish.
The passage reads: “Born in 1796 to a highly educated clan of Jewish lawyers and silversmiths on his father’s side”

 

The Lone Assassin Myth is Born Modern researchers have uncovered evidence of a massive conspiracy that links the following parties to the Bank of Rothschild: Lincoln’s Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, John Wilkes Booth, his eight co-conspirators, and over seventy government officials and businessmen involved in the conspiracy. When Booth’s diary was recovered by Stanton’s troops, it was delivered to Stanton. When it was later produced during the investigation, eighteen pages had been ripped out. These pages, containing the aforementioned names,were later found in the attic of one of Stanton’s descendants.From Booth’s trunk, a coded message was found that linked him directly to Judah P. Benjamin, the Civil War campaign manager in the South for the House of Rothschild.

When the war ended, the key to the code was found in Benjamin’s possession.Theassassin, portrayed as a crazed lone gunman with a few radical friends, escaped by way of the only bridge in Washington not guarded by Stanton’s troops.”Booth” was located hiding in a barn near Port Royal, Virginia, three days after escaping from Washington. He was shot by a soldier named Boston Corbett, who fired without orders. Whether or not the man killed was Booth is still a matter of contention, but the fact remains that whoever it was, he had no chance to identify himself. It was Secretary of War Edwin Stanton who made the final identification. Some now believe that a dupe was used and that the real John Wilkes Booth escaped with Stanton’s assistance.

Mary Todd Lincoln, upon hearing of her husband’s death, began screaming, “Oh, that dreadful house!” Earlier historians felt that this spontaneous utterance referred to the White House. Some now believe it may have been directed to Thomas W. House, a gun runner, financier, and agent of the Rothschild’s during the Civil War, who was linked to the anti-Lincoln, pro-banker interests.

* People’s Will group, killed Russian Czar Alexander in 1881.

Alexander II, Russian Tsar, Murdered by Jewish Terrorists

Source

The Jews had been running commercial life in Poland. Since 1792, Poland had been governed by Russia. The Russian governors had occasionally taken action against their crimes. This aroused considerable resentment. How about a little revolt?The tsar, Nicholas I, put down one of many Jewish rebellions in 1831.
(Henri Troyat, Zar Alexander II., Societaets-Verlag, 1990, p.31) The Jews didn’t let a little military defeat discourage them, so they had another go at Nicholas I. He became ill in 1855. Word was that the Jews had poisoned him. And so he died. (id., pp. 33-34)He was succeeded by his silly son, who became known as Tsar Alexander II. A war had been raging in the Crimea. Alexander II ended the war with a peace deal. Russia didn’t have to do much. They just had give up their role as the protector of Christians in the Ottoman empire. (id., p. 46) Up to that time, the Ottoman empire was forced to treat Christians with some respect. Now all that would change as the Jewish donmah from Saloniki would proceed to kill millions of Christians ending with the slaughter of 1915.

In 1861, the Jews started another revolution in Poland. (id., p. 80) A Jew, Jaroschinski, who was a tailor, tried to shoot the Russian governor in Poland, Grand Prince Konstantin. Another Jew put a bullet through the jaw of the tsar’s representative Lueders. (id., p. 84) (pic: Wikipedia)

The Jew Jaroschinski and several other terrorists were executed. (id., p. 85) The Jews in general were irritated by these developments. So they launched a general uprising in January 1863. (id., p. 85) Needless to say, the Jewish press in France took the part of the rebels. They called the Russians bloodthirsty barbarians. (id., p. 88)

And how did Tsar Alexander II react? He weakened the aristocracy, and thought to give more democracy “for the people”. (id., p. 107) But what really sealed his fate was the abolition of the tax farming system on liquors. This was a Jewish business. When the tax farming operations were phased out in favor of an excise tax in 1863 (Ben Eklof, John Bushnell, Larisa Georgievna Zakharova, Russia’s Great Reforms, 1855-1881, Indiana University Press, 1994, p. 110), the Jews knew that this tsar had to go.

The Jews were just campaigning for “democracy”, right? And they quite their agitation? Not at all. As we learned here, Jews regard any compromise as weakness. The Jew Pissarew was working as a literary critic at the Russkoje Slowo. He advocated revolutionary action. (Troyat, p. 110)

It must be noted here that the Russian peasants did not support revolutionary efforts. They demonstrated a solid faith in the Tsar. (Peter Waldron, The End of Imperial Russia, 1855 – 1917, MacMillian Press, 1997, p. 22) Unfortunately, this faith was not merited. Even though Alexander II was a weak man who made stupid decisions, he still had some intelligent advisers. Like Prince Basil Dolgorukow. In 1862, Prince Dolgorukow advised the tsar that his weakness and concessions to the Jews would end in his demise. The prince recommended arresting 50 of the worst Jews.

The tsar didn’t want to follow this wise advice. (Troyat, p. 112)

So how can we tell if the prince was right or not?

Well, just look at what happens next: In 1866, a Jew tried to shoot the tsar while he was out walking. The Jew claimed that the tsar hadn’t given the people enough land. (id., pp. 114 – 115)

Prince Dolgorukow had been right all along.

So the tsar took the wise advice now?

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

No, he just showed how foolish he was. The tsar’s response to the attempted killing was to dismiss Prince Dolgorukow. (id., p. 117) The prince had to go, but the tsar retained a number of Jews (most baptized) on his staff (id., p. 122)

The prince had told the tsar what the problem was, but Tsar Alexander didn’t want to hear the truth. Instead, he pretended that he was puzzled, and wanted to know what the cause was. (id., p. 118)

The shooting was a wake-up call, but the tsar just ignored it. How much longer before Prince Dolgorukow’s prophecy came into fulfillment?

On June 6, 1867, the tsar was visiting in Paris. The Jew Beresowskij squeezed off two shots, but both missed the mark. (id., p. 144) In 1879, an explosion hit the tsar’s baggage train. (id., picture 20) The Jews on his staff had apparently tipped the Jewish bombers, but a last-minute change in schedule was apparently not passed on. In April 1879, the Jew Solowjew tried to shoot him. (id., picture 21)

Alexander II, Russian Tsar

* Charles Guiteau, killed American President James Garfield in 1881.

After the Civil War, all money in the United States was created by bankers buying U.S. government bonds in exchange for bank notes.

 

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.46.32 AMJames A. Garfield became president in 1881, and he was a staunch opponent of the banking powers. In 1881 he said the following:
“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.”

He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation.
President James A. Garfield

 

President Garfield was shot about two weeks later by Charles J. Guiteau on July 2nd, 1881.

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.50.42 AM

He died from medical complications on September 19th, 1881.

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.50.56 AM

 

* Leon Czolgocz, killed American president William McKinley in New York state in 1901.

Do You Remember When President McKinley Was Assassinated By Jews To Usher In Federal Reserve Act of 1913?

In 1906, the U.S. stock market was setting all kinds of records. However, in March 1907 the U.S. stock market absolutely crashed. It is alleged that elite New York bankers were responsible.

In addition, in 1907 J.P. Morgan circulated rumors that a major New York bank had gone bankrupt. This caused a massive run on the banks. In turn, the banks started recalling all of their loans. The panic of 1907 resulted in a congressional investigation that ended up concluding that a central bank was “necessary” so that these kinds of panics would never happen again.

It took a few years, but the international bankers finally got their central bank in 1913.

Congress voted on the Rothschild’s Federal Reserve Act on December 22nd, 1913 between the hours of 1:30 AM and 4:30 AM.

A significant portion of Congress was either sleeping at the time or was already at home with their families celebrating the holidays.

The president that signed the law that created the Federal Reserve, Woodrow Wilson, later sounded like he very much regretted the decision when he wrote the following:
“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men … [W]e have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world–no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

* Gavril Princip, killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in 1914.

World War I begins when Austria-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand is assassinated by Jewish student Gavrilo Princip and a group of co-conspirators. William Pelley claims that the assassins were financed by Jewish businessman Herbert Samuel of Britain, owner of Shell Oil. Over 10 million Europeans are killed in this war. World War I is a disasterous war and it starts the decline of the European people. World War I is supported by Jews such as Nathan Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, Bernard Baruch, Ernest Cassel, Louis Brandeis, Chaim Weizmann, Theodore Bethmann, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

* Sverdlov, killed Russian Czar Nicholas II and his family in 1918.

* Carl Weiss, killed US senator Huey Long in 1935.

* US Government, killed president Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua in 1956.
* US Government, killed president Patrice Lumumba of the Congo in 1961.

* US Government, killed president Ngo Diem of Vietnam in 1963.

* American president John F. Kennedy in 1963

THE ISRAELI CONNECTION

Why would Israel have an interest in participating in the JFK assassination conspiracy? That was the burning question.

It was just about the time that I had begun to take a second look at the Lansky connection to the Kennedy assassination that several new works about the covert relationship between the United States and Israel were released providing never-before revealed information.

These books, cited extensively in Final Judgment, made it all too clear that John F. Kennedy-before his death-was in a pitched battle with Israel. In fact, Kennedy was at war.

This was something that long-time JFK assassination researchers had no reason to know about. Much of the material had long been classified. It was a secret-a deep, dark secret.

Some of JFK’s communications with then-Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion are still classified. Not even top-level intelligence officials with special security clearance have been allowed access to these potentially explosive documents.

This discovery made me realize that there was a lot more to the Kennedy relationship with Israel and a lot more about the JFK assassination than we had ever been told.

* American senator Robert Kennedy in 1968
Shocking Info in this book!

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 11.48.33 AM
* US Government, killed Salvador Allende of Chile in 1973.
Shocking Info in this book!

Zionist Henry Kissinger pressed Nixon to overthrow the democratically elected Allende government because his “‘model’ effect can be insidious,” documents show

On 40th anniversary of coup, Archive posts top ten documents on Kissinger’s role in undermining democracy, supporting military dictatorship in Chile

Kissinger overruled aides on military regime’s human rights atrocities; told Pinochet in 1976: “We want to help, not undermine you. You did a great service to the West in overthrowing Allende.”

Revelations:

  • On September 12, eight days after Allende’s election, Kissinger initiated discussion on the telephone with CIA director Richard Helm’s about a preemptive coup in Chile. “We will not let Chile go down the drain,” Kissinger declared. “I am with you,” Helms responded. Their conversation took place three days before President Nixon, in a 15-minute meeting that included Kissinger, ordered the CIA to “make the economy scream,” and named Kissinger as the supervisor of the covert efforts to keep Allende from being inaugurated. Since the Kissinger/Helms “telcon” was not known to the Church Committee, the Senate report on U.S. intervention in Chile and subsequent histories date the initiation of U.S. efforts to sponsor regime change in Chile to the September 15 meeting.
  • Kissinger ignored a recommendation from his top deputy on the NSC, Viron Vaky, who strongly advised against covert action to undermine Allende. On September 14, Vaky wrote a memo to Kissinger arguing that coup plotting would lead to “widespread violence and even insurrection.” He also argued that such a policy was immoral: “What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally depart from them only to meet the gravest threat to us, e.g. to our survival. Is Allende a mortal threat to the U.S.? It is hard to argue this.”
  • After U.S. covert operations, which led to the assassination of Chilean Commander in Chief of the Armed forces General Rene Schneider, failed to stop Allende’s inauguration on November 4, 1970, Kissinger lobbied President Nixon to reject the State Department’s recommendation that the U.S. seek a modus vivendi with Allende. In an eight-page secret briefing paper that provided Kissinger’s clearest rationale for regime change in Chile, he emphasized to Nixon that “the election of Allende as president of Chile poses for us one of the most serious challenges ever faced in this hemisphere” and “your decision as to what to do about it may be the most historic and difficult foreign affairs decision you will make this year.” Not only were a billion dollars of U.S. investments at stake, Kissinger reported, but what he called “the insidious model effect” of his democratic election. There was no way for the U.S. to deny Allende’s legitimacy, Kissinger noted, and if he succeeded in peacefully reallocating resources in Chile in a socialist direction, other countries might follow suit. “The example of a successful elected Marxist government in Chile would surely have an impact on — and even precedent value for — other parts of the world, especially in Italy; the imitative spread of similar phenomena elsewhere would in turn significantly affect the world balance and our own position in it.”The next day Nixon made it clear to the entire National Security Council that the policy would be to bring Allende down. “Our main concern,” he stated, “is the prospect that he can consolidate himself and the picture projected to the world will be his success.”
  • In the days following the coup, Kissinger ignored the concerns of his top State Department aides about the massive repression by the new military regime. He sent secret instructions to his ambassador to convey to Pinochet “our strongest desires to cooperate closely and establish firm basis for cordial and most constructive relationship.” When his assistant secretary of state for inter-American affairs asked him what to tell Congress about the reports of hundreds of people being killed in the days following the coup, he issued these instructions: “I think we should understand our policy-that however unpleasant they act, this government is better for us than Allende was.” The United States assisted the Pinochet regime in consolidating, through economic and military aide, diplomatic support and CIA assistance in creating Chile’s infamous secret police agency, DINA.
  • At the height of Pinochet’s repression in 1975, Secretary Kissinger met with the Chilean foreign minister, Admiral Patricio Carvajal. Instead of taking the opportunity to press the military regime to improve its human rights record, Kissinger opened the meeting by disparaging his own staff for putting the issue of human rights on the agenda. “I read the briefing paper for this meeting and it was nothing but Human Rights,” he told Carvajal. “The State Department is made up of people who have a vocation for the ministry. Because there are not enough churches for them, they went into the Department of State.”
  • As Secretary Kissinger prepared to meet General Augusto Pinochet in Santiago in June 1976, his top deputy for Latin America, William D. Rogers, advised him make human rights central to U.S.-Chilean relations and to press the dictator to “improve human rights practices.” Instead, a declassified transcript of their conversation reveals, Kissinger told Pinochet that his regime was a victim of leftist propaganda on human rights. “In the United States, as you know, we are sympathetic with what you are trying to do here,” Kissinger told Pinochet. “We want to help, not undermine you. You did a great service to the West in overthrowing Allende.”

* Yigal Amir, killed Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.

Zionist Israeli killed own prime minister

 

JFK Assassination: Creepy Ted Cruz Admits His Dad Killed JFK And He May Might Not Be Joking

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

CruzJFK3Ted Cruz Admits His Dad Killed JFK

[News] WTF – National Enquirer links Ted Cruz’s Dad to JFK Assassination?

Ted Cruz’s Father With Lee Harvey Oswald : Video JFK assassination Day

Wayne Madsen: Ted Cruz’s Father Was Associated with CIA’s anti-Castro Operations in the 1960’s

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

Mossad connection to JFK Conspiracy

Israeli Mossad Did 9/11 and Assassinated JFK – John Lear

Ted Cruz fired back at Donald Trump, calling him a “pathological liar” after Trump accused his father of being involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Cruz took his response one step further by proclaiming that “While I’m at it, I guess I should go ahead and admit, yes, my Dad killed JFK, I am secretly Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa is buried in my backyard,” the senator joked while speaking to reporters in Indiana. Elliot Hill and Joya Mia Italiano take a closer look at Ted Cruz’s new approach to handling Donald Trump’s attacks on the Lip News.


Did Cruz Clan Collude With JFK Assassination Patsy?

Both Jesus & John F Kennedy sentenced to death when they challenged the Satanic money changers

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

Both Jesus & John F Kennedy sentenced to death when they challenged the Satanic money changers

ZioSatanicBanking

 

Video: “12 YEAR OLD GIRL” TALKING ABOUT THE “MONEY CHANGERS”! Talks About Canada But Same In USA and Other Satanic Occupied Governments.


Usury – The Real Reason The Jews Would Kill Jesus All Over Again.


Confessions Of A Jewish Banker

Michael Collins Piper: FINAL JUDGEMENT lecture [Mossad connection to JFK Conspiracy]


 

JFK Killed Just Days After Shutting Down Rothschild’s Fed Reserve In 1963: Secret Memo Shows President Signed Executive Orders EO-11 And EO-110! ORDERS ARE STILL IN FORCE BUT NOT ENFORCED!!!

THE U.S. CITIZEN IS TO OWN THEIR OWN MONEY NOT ROTHSCHILD

Dead witnesses.

Article Source

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Rothschild Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest.

With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificats were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes.

This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the gevernment the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money.

Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.

Rense

With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress.

We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy – the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the United States federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money – without going through the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank.

mussolini rothschild

President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11,110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.”

Contrary To Wikipedia.

After Mr. Kennedy was assassinated just five months later, no more silver certificates were issued. The Final Call has learned that the Executive Order was never repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid.

Why then has no president utilized it? Virtually all of the nearly $6 trillion in debt has been created since 1963, and if a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt would be nowhere near the current level.

Rense

This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury‘s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations.

$10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

Jacob Rothschild

  1. The Gold & Silver Manipulators Are At The End Of Their Rope:
  2. Netanyahu: I Won’t Be Silenced On Rothschild’s Security ~ Rothschild’s ‘State Of’ Israel Has Now Bombed Syria Twice!

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.

We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order.

They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it.

kennedy-assassination-head

Could the bullet have entered the back of the head?

Nope!

LETTER FROM A WARREN COMMISSION MEMBER WHO DID NOT BELIEVE THE “MAGIC BULLET” THEORY.

It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new “money”. Executive Order 11,110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

A number of “Kennedy bills” were indeed issued – the author has a five dollar bill in his possession with the heading “United States Note” – but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy’s death.

According to information from the Library of the Comptroller of the Currency, Executive Order 11,110 remains in effect today, although successive administrations beginning with that of President Lyndon Johnson apparently have simply ignored it and instead returned to the practice of paying interest on Federal Reserve notes.

Today we continue to use Federal Reserve Notes, and the deficit is at an all-time high. The point being made is that the IRS taxes you pay aren’t used for government services. It won’t hurt you, or the nation, to legally reduce or eliminate your tax liability.  From The Final Call, Vol15, No.6, on January 17, 1996 (USA)

APFN

Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 “Silver Certificates” were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Rothschild Federal Reserve’s control over the creation of money.

It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the “powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance”. With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:

1) war (Viet Nam); and,

2) the creation of money by a privately owned Rothschild central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11,110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank.

Obama’s Executive Order 13489

Executive Order 11,110

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended – (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): “(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,” and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963

 

Once again, Executive Order 11,110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:

Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:

EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;

EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;

EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;

EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;

EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617

The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy’s 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy’s EO 11,110. A search of Clinton’s 1998 and 1999 EO’s and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11,110.

 

The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black’s Law Dictionary defines the “Federal Reserve System” as: “Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves.” Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED.

This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: “Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank’s nine member board of directors”.

The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:

“Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)”.

The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the “money” we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: “The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving to print them”.


Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!

No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt.

The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it”.

Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.

The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it’s interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913.

The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs’ 1990 book Crossfire:”

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder
  1. Federal Judge Henry Hudson: Obama Was Never President Of The USA

Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy’s attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the Constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Rothschild Federal Reserve System, who print paper money & then loan it to the government at interest. SCAM CITY.

He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.

Kennedy’s comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks”.

  1. Rothschild

In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy said:

“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American’s freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight.”

  1. Vatican vs Illuminati

In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book… a true Profile of Courage.

This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne

What is the Federal Reserve Bank?

What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?

by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999

The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country’s fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn’t for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.

  1. Memo surfaces linking Oswald to CIA 

There have been three central banks in our nation’s history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as “fractional banking.”

Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these “depositors” a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.

In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.

Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were “fractionally” backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.

Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.

AFTER 1913 ~ The Glass Steagall Act Enacted By FDR blocked all attempts by Rothschild making Banking Investment into The U.S. economy through his Fed Reserve. In 1999 Bill Clinton Repealed The Glass Steagall Act which thus allowed The Housing Bubble To Take Form And Hit The Apex in 2008, By Fraudulent UnBacked Credit Mortgages To Unsuspecting U.S. Citizens.

This Fraudulent Act Left Americans Wiped Out Of Their Retirements, College Funds, Homes, & Jobs. To put icing on the cake, in order for these unbacked derivative mortgages to be backed, Obama printed $TRILLIONS of new currency which was fraudulently called a [BANKING BAILOUT].

America THROUGH THIS SCAM IS TO BE subjugated to Rothschild International Banking Cabal for the next 30 years IN HIGH TAXATION, unless The Glass Steagall Act Is reintroduced.Right now Rockefeller [Rothschild Puppet] uses McCain [Rockefeller Puppet] to give the appearance that there is a counter conservative movement in the Republican party.

McCain since the 1999 Repeal of the Glass Steagall Act has proffered S.190 which would have removed Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac from the clutches of derivative unbacked mortgage notes in the housing industry.

Yes, all these attempts were marched thru the media as a noble patriotic duty being fulfilled by the GOP, but it was done during a time when Frank/Reid could simply table [sit on] the issue. That Is Exactly What Frank/Dodd/& Reid DID!

FORGET PROSECUTION = GET OUR MONEY BACK! This same modus operandi was marched through the media for the hungry ears of the American Citizen, when it came to the McCain/Cantwell Bill [which is a watered down version of The Glass Steagall Act.

When this bill was introduced, The U.S. State Department was issued an ultimatum to quash this bill or it would be received in The U.K. as an Act Of War against Britain. Remember now, The British people are going through the same SCAM as The American Citizen – but The Monarchy is not part of The British Citizenry.

They are a neutered bull, waiting and hoping that they can gain IMPERIAL power once again by shoving this NWO Scam down everyone’s throat. Rothschild & The Queen are behind this megalomaniac design using the power of The Rothschild International Banking Cabal.

Convicted Felon George Soros: Crafted The So Called Stimulus Plan & Invested in Companies That Would Profit From It. Calling Darrell Issa

Yes George Soros Is One Of The Illuminati Operatives Who’s Job Is To Orchestrate Insider Trading Mechanisms.

Clinton allowed Soros In By Repealing The Glass Steagall Act Of 1999 To Set Up TheHousing Bubble To [PUMP] via [unbacked meaningless derivative credit mortgage papers] while at the same time using off shore Hedge funds to invest against the housing industry KNOWING full well the bubble would burst [The DUMP] because it was created by fraud and would not be sustainable by the hollow credit paper that was issued predatorily.

  1. SOROS HAS A WOODY AND ITS NAME IS HOLLYWOOD: Take Every Penny Convicted Felon Capitalist George Soros Has To Give ~ As He Absconded It In The First Place ~ He’s 81 And The Hour Is Getting Late!

Yes, George Soros was convicted of this crime in France and is now a FELON! But he got a simple mere several $Billion fine ~ while still laughing all the way to the bank.

  1. Power Of Glass-Steagall Act: A Blow Against British Monarchy’s London Banks ~ Monarchy Threatens With War If Passed!

Well guess what? Frank/Reid are sitting on this bill as well. McCain once again brings up something that could work, but his attempts are brought up with Frank/Reid in power  SITTING ON THEM and not allowing those bills to be voted upon.

This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.

The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.

The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.

Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.

  • Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.

The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles. 

Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late ’20s and all through the ’30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don’t we?

Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?

Do you think they will do it again?

Just as an aside at this point, look at today’s economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses.

Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?

Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?

Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.

Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.

This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.

JOHN {PATRIOT}, ROBERT {PATRIOT}, EDWARD {TURNCOAT} KENNEDY!

JOHN {PATRIOT}, ROBERT {PATRIOT}, EDWARD {TURNCOAT} KENNEDY!

THE LAST GREAT PRESIDENT WHO FOUGHT THE CORRUPTED DEMOCRACY, FOR THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC!

FACT! President Kennedy Was Shot Because He Refused To Cooperate With The Crown For The Vietnam War! Vietnam War Was Part Of The 50 Year Cycle Objective To Destroy America From Inside. The JFK intention to end the Vietnam War (which was a very profitable war for the bankers) by 1965 would severely have cut the profits of the private owned Federal Reserve Bank and the banking establishment.

The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. “Federal” would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. “Reserve” would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. “System” was used in lieu of the word “bank” so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.

In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.

Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.

Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as “Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig.” Yes, that’s right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.

Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term “monetizing the debt,” which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.

Anonymous

Video shows Kennedy’s Secret Service ordered to stand down.

The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it’s just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let’s use another example.

Today’s banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today’s banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.

Let’s say you’re approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn’t actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.

It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn’t it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don’t want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.

Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.

So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.

If “We the People” don’t take some action now, there may come a time when “We the People” are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can “coin money and regulate the value thereof.” The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.

Thomas Jefferson said, “If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, “Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?”
“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt.”

John P. Curran

Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html

Woodrow Wilson Born Of A British Mother. Ask Him To Smile Once And You'll See Those Famous British Gnarly Teeth

Woodrow Wilson Born Of A British Mother. Ask Him To Smile Once And You’ll See Those Famous British Gnarly Teeth

  1. Public Regret Announcement: John Boehner Regrets, Woodrow Wilson Regrets! What Sedition Looks Like!
  2. Did Woodrow Wilson REALLY REGRET Handing AMERICA To The Rothschild BANKSTERS?
  3. Out Of The Closet Thief JP Morgan Bank: Sold Fraudulent Loans To The Secondary Market ~ Credit Unions ~ Criminal Investigation Continues!

THIS IS WHAT IS ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE RIGHT NOW! Claiming U.S. Wealth Of Gold And In Its Place Like A Tooth Fairy Leaving Only 'Worthless Fiat Printed USD Money'. NIXON ILLEGALLY DROPPED OUR GOLD BACKING FOR ROTHSCHILD TO PILFER THE U.S. WITH PAPER. NOW THAT THE U.S. IS SMOTHERED WITH FORCED PAPER [ARTIFICIAL] DEBT ~ ROTHSCHILD HAS BEEN [MERGING] THE GOLD FROM LIBYA TO HIS VAULTS. ONE OF ROTHSCHILD'S VAULTS IS NOW BAGHDAD. THIS IS WHY ROTHSCHILD'S COMEX HAS ALSO BEEN ARTIFICIALLY DUMPING THE GOLD/SILVER CHARTS -> TO GET PEOPLE OUT OF THE GOLD/SILVER MARKET -> JUST REMEMBER SILVER IS 5Xs MORE SCARCE THAN GOLD AND INDUSTRY USES SILVER FAR MORE SO THAN GOLD. JUST WAIT UNTIL THE BOTTOM IS HIT ON THIS ONE ~ THE PRECIOUS METALS MARKET WILL SKY ROCKET INTO INFINITY AND THOSE MESMERIZED BY FOOTBALL GAMES AND PARIS HILTON WILL BE EATING CAT FOOD IN THE ALLEYS I AM VERY SORRY TO SAY THIS IS THE ELITIST GAME AND THATS HOW THESE SOCIOPATHS THINK AND THIS IS ALSO HOW WE AMERICANS GAVE UP ON OUT THINKING THESE VIGILANT PARASITES. ~ Click To Enlarge ~

THIS IS WHAT IS ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE RIGHT NOW!
Claiming U.S. Wealth Of Gold And In Its Place Like A Tooth Fairy Leaving Only ‘Worthless Fiat Printed USD Money’.
NIXON ILLEGALLY DROPPED OUR GOLD BACKING FOR ROTHSCHILD TO PILFER THE U.S. WITH PAPER. NOW THAT THE U.S. IS SMOTHERED WITH FORCED PAPER [ARTIFICIAL] DEBT ~ ROTHSCHILD HAS BEEN [MERGING] THE GOLD FROM LIBYA TO HIS VAULTS. ONE OF ROTHSCHILD’S VAULTS IS NOW BAGHDAD. THIS IS WHY ROTHSCHILD’S COMEX HAS ALSO BEEN ARTIFICIALLY DUMPING THE GOLD/SILVER CHARTS -> TO GET PEOPLE OUT OF THE GOLD/SILVER MARKET -> JUST REMEMBER SILVER IS 5Xs MORE SCARCE THAN GOLD AND INDUSTRY USES SILVER FAR MORE SO THAN GOLD. JUST WAIT UNTIL THE BOTTOM IS HIT ON THIS ONE ~ THE PRECIOUS METALS MARKET WILL SKY ROCKET INTO INFINITY AND THOSE MESMERIZED BY FOOTBALL GAMES AND PARIS HILTON WILL BE EATING CAT FOOD IN THE ALLEYS I AM VERY SORRY TO SAY THIS IS THE ELITIST GAME AND THATS HOW THESE SOCIOPATHS THINK AND THIS IS ALSO HOW WE AMERICANS GAVE UP ON OUT THINKING THESE VIGILANT PARASITES.
~ Click To Enlarge ~

In the wake of Watergate and President Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974, a “reform” Congress undertook investigations of the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies–the Church Committee published 14 reports containing its findings. With the public airing of the Zapruder home movie of the JFK assassination showing Kennedy reacting to an apparent shot from the front, there were calls for reinvestigation of this and other political assassinations of the 1960s.

In 1976, the House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a “probable conspiracy,” though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby’s underworld connections. The acoustics evidence was disputed by a panel of scientists, but that “debunking” has itself come under attack recently.

The massive internal files of the HSCA were unsealed in the wake of the 1992 JFK Assassination Records Collection Act. Still being digested by researchers, they have shed more light on the assassination itself and also on the conduct of the HSCA’s investigation.

History Matters

Jack Ruby worked for Richard Nixon

Ruby Nixon